The Eerie Similarities Between American Homeowner Foreclosure and the US House Impeachment Inquiry(s)

By Sydney Sullivan

For over a decade, American Homeowners have been fighting the corruption that stems from the banks to legislators and down through the judiciary… and all the way up to the top of the political chain. Mortgages and Notes were faux pieces of paper created after American Homeowners filled out Fannie Mae 1003 applications where their personal  information and properties were sold into securitization/rehypothecation slavery before they signed the fake mortgage deals.

With this corruption grew tons of charlatans riding the gravy train at the expense of naive, sleepy homeowners and business owners who trusted their banks and government. Mortgage brokers and banks threw caution out the door just to get a name and data into the system with phony promises all would work out – however, the investment banks knew it wouldn’t. It appears there never was any intention for a long term mortgage arrangement. It was just a bubble as the Rule of Law had been assassinated by the manipulation of state and federal statutes (legislators) that resulted horrid case law (judges) that benefited the banks, US Treasury and ultimately the Federal Reserve.

American Homeowners couldn’t defend themselves without an attorney because the legal procedure and system are so convoluted and rigged. Finding an affordable attorney that knew what they were doing was nearly impossible. Lower Court Foreclosure Judges weren’t following the Rule of Law, didn’t understand securitization and had no knowledge of securities law. These were not traditional mortgages – but nobody openly discussed the scam. Like many legislators, judges also found cushy deals with their own mortgages when homeowners couldn’t get a modification – that the Obama administration offered and touted through a fake scheme called HAMP.

A Hoover vacuum cleaner was less powerful than the Obama HAMP program that sucked homeowners up through TV, radio and print ads to call their servicers to get a modification. Homeowners were told they had to miss 3-4 payments to qualify for the program. When they did their modification application was denied and the foreclosure proceeding began.

Long before “Q” surfaced, American Homeowners had their own band of anons digging into the securitization/rehypothecation (shadow banking) scheme. From fraudulent assignment of mortgage documents, forgeries, fraudulent REMIC trusts, pretender-lenders, inflated appraisals, manipulated mortgage applications, servicers to USPTO patents which designed and spelled out the corrupt system intention.

For a while the main street media (MSM) carried these stories – but although relatively unknown homeowners had already been sabotaged by a coordinated smear campaign that started 4-5 years before the 2008 crash. About the time the FBI had begun investigating mortgage fraud, the mockingbird media came out with the phrases “liars loans” and “people bought more than they could afford” at the end of their stories. Back when there were real reporters, some saw through “narrative” and tried to drive critical points home. Before Donald J. Trump entered the picture there were news anchors that felt so compelled to wake up the country they put their job on the line. One such Patriot was Dylan Ratigan, whose 2011 on-air rant was epic.

Dylan wasn’t the first to connect the dots, but not until Donald Trump hit the campaign trail and these Impeachment inquiries become the only news on MSM, did the drops of information begin to answer the reason – why? Why were these foreclosures happening? Why were courts refusing to review forged documents and securitization? Why were the good defense attorneys facing disbarment for representing their homeowner clients and the Rule of Law? Surely, corruption wasn’t the answer… but now it appears it may have been.

LivingLies’ Neil Garfield put together a succinct post wherein he outlines the courts’ justification – as lame as it may be in: Why Are All the Documents Fake in Foreclosures?

“While Judges recognize irregularities in the documents and procedures invoked in foreclosures, they are proceeding under the doctrine  of “damnum absque injuria.” The judges are saying that there might be a violation but there is no injury because you owe the money and didn’t pay it therefore you should lose your home and the interests of justice are thereby served.”

It’s no conspiracy theory that the banks pre-orchestrated the foreclosure crisis. It is spelled out in each in and every federal investigation, complaint, consent order and in their USPTO patents without having to read between the lines.

So, how do US House impeachment inquiry hearings compare to American Homeowners’ foreclosures?

First, think of California Rep. Adam Schiff as the “bank” (foreclosure Plaintiff) and the bank’s attorneys – yes, both of them (one in the same). View President Trump as the Homeowner. Schiff is trying to oust President Trump from the White House – in other words ‘foreclose on President Trump’s 2016 election.’ And this started within minutes after the inauguration – if not before. Same with homeowners. According to the securitization patents, the foreclosure process was already in place from the very beginning of the Fannie 1003 loan application..

Now imagine Schiff, as the bank, is controlling everything (including – in most cases even the court). He doesn’t have to produce evidence (‘hearsay is better than real evidence’). Schiff claims President Trump must be impeached,similarly the banks assert (with fraudulent documents) you must be foreclosed on and ejected from your home. Like President Trump, you have very little opportunity to state your own case or confront the accusers who signed those falsified affidavits, declarations and Assignments of Mortgage.

What Schiff doesn’t have, he makes it up. Schiff has the MSM to carry an impeachment narrative – just like what the banks do to American Homeowners. ‘Homeowners are deadbeats and deserve to lose their homes.’ You never even got a chance to rebut their un-investigated claims.

If you were lucky enough to have a bank’s witness testify (lie) that they had personal knowledge and you or your attorney cross-examined the bank’s witness and proved that they had no personal knowledge of your overall transaction and account, or that there were errors and glitches in the bank’s software (where, in any other case than foreclosure would be enough to eliminate the weight of the witness’ testimony), the judge still favored the bank – wink, wink.

Just like Adam Schiff’s impeachment inquiry hearings – in most cases, you never got due process, a trial – let alone a well-deserved JURY trial. The judges just listened to the bank’s attorneys, discounted everything you or your attorney had to say and made a rather uninformed (nice word for corrupt) decision against you.

Schiff’s phony reading of the fake leaker’s accuser’s accounting of President Trump on his Ukraine phone call isn’t much different than reading a foreclosure complaint or an Assignment of Mortgage. You’re not allowed to demand the signatories found on the Assignments to be brought into court. And even though you’ve got depositions, affidavits, declarations and various other proof that the signatures are forged – the bank is running the show and won’t produce these complicit individuals – nor will the court force them to appear.

The American Homeowners lose their homes, not on factual evidence, but on forgeries, fraudulent documents and a horrid securities scheme that was pre-designed to bust unions, drain pension funds and screw investors. This is the same thing that is happening in the U.S. House of Representatives’ Impeachment hoax. As a homeowner, if you faced foreclosure, you can see it – you can feel it, and frankly you can hate the corrupt process by the phony establishment bought and paid for by the banks.

Its very eerie to know the details of foreclosure corruption and watch the impeachment process where they blow off the Rule of Law, facts, and the Constitution just like the banks and corrupted foreclosure judges do. All for what? Globalization and big bucks! Just sayin’…

Your thoughts are, as always, welcome.